Loading...
Loading...
Explore the foundations of multi-qubit quantum mechanics: tensor product spaces, the CNOT gate, Bell states, the EPR paradox, and Bell's theorem with the CHSH inequality.
When we combine two qubits, their joint state lives in the tensor product of their individual Hilbert spaces. A general two-qubit state can be written as , where the basis states , , , and are tensor products of the single-qubit computational basis.
The normalization condition requires , ensuring the total probability of finding the system in one of the four basis states is unity. For separable states, we can factor the state as , but most states in the Hilbert space cannot be factored in this way.
The dimensionality of an -qubit system scales as , which is the root of both quantum computing's power and the difficulty of simulating quantum systems classically.
Two-qubit state
Normalization
The Controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate is the fundamental two-qubit gate in quantum computing. It acts on two qubits: a control qubit and a target qubit. In the computational basis, the CNOT gate flips the target qubit if and only if the control qubit is .
Mathematically, the action of CNOT is , where denotes addition modulo 2. The matrix representation in the computational basis is a unitary matrix.
One of the most important applications of CNOT is generating entanglement. When applied to , where , the CNOT gate produces the maximally entangled Bell state .
CNOT matrix
Bell state generation
The four Bell states form a maximally entangled orthonormal basis for the two-qubit Hilbert space. They are defined as superpositions of two basis states with equal amplitudes and specific relative phases. Any two-qubit state can be expressed as a linear combination of these four states.
Maximal entanglement means that measuring one qubit completely determines the state of the other, with no information gained about the individual qubits beforehand. This is reflected in the reduced density matrix of either subsystem being the maximally mixed state .
Bell states
Bell states (continued)
Reduced density matrix
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) presented a thought experiment challenging the completeness of quantum mechanics. They considered two particles in an entangled state shared between Alice and Bob, spatially separated. If Alice measures her qubit and obtains , Bob's state instantaneously collapses to , and similarly for .
EPR argued that since no signal can travel faster than light, the outcome of Bob's measurement must be predetermined by hidden variables. They introduced the principle of local realism: physical properties are real and independent of measurement (realism), and influences cannot propagate faster than light (locality).
Quantum mechanics predicts correlations that cannot be explained by any local hidden variable theory, setting the stage for Bell's theorem.
Bell's theorem provides a way to experimentally distinguish quantum mechanics from local hidden variable theories. The CHSH inequality is the most commonly tested version. Consider two parties, Alice and Bob, each choosing between two measurement settings. The CHSH quantity is constructed from the expectation values of their outcomes.
For any local hidden variable theory, the absolute value of is bounded by 2: . However, quantum mechanics allows correlations strong enough to violate this bound. The maximum quantum value, known as the Tsirelson bound, is .
Experimentally observing rules out local realism. To calculate , one evaluates the expectation values for different measurement settings and combines them according to the CHSH operator.
CHSH quantity
Classical bound
Tsirelson bound
Papers:
Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Section 1.3, Section 2.2, Section 2.6
1. How many complex amplitudes are required to specify the state of qubits?
2. What is the action of the CNOT gate on the two-qubit state ?
3. Which of the following is the reduced density matrix of either qubit in a maximally entangled Bell state?
4. What is the Tsirelson bound for the CHSH inequality?
5. Calculate the expectation value for the Bell state .